Are you ready to amplify your academic presence and connect with a global network of researchers? Join the Scholar Indexing Society and elevate your research to new heights!
Today, a combination of globalization of pharmaceutical production, lack of regulatory harmonization, and weakness of
Medicines Regulatory Authorities, creates the “perfect conditions” for poor-quality medicine to circulate in the global
market and to penetrate the less-regulated countries. Medicines regulation is the responsibility of the national
regulatory authorities in the recipient country, but in the poorer countries, in practice, the responsibility of supply of
quality-assured medicines is often taken by Non-Governmental Organizations and other implementers. But with some
notable exceptions, many donors lack a pharmaceutical procurement policy with adequate quality requirements; and
many implementers lack the skills and expertise needed to orient themselves in the complex web of global
pharmaceutical supply. Thus, patients served by humanitarian or development programs may remain exposed to the
risk of poor-quality medicines.
When public money is used to purchase medicines for medical programs to be carried out overseas, adequate policies
should be in place to assure that the same quality requirements are set that would be required for medicines
marketed in the “donor” country.
We will describe here a policy recently adopted in Belgium, i.e. the “Commitment to Quality Assurance for Pharmaceutical
Products”, signed in October 2017 by the Vice Prime Minister and Minister for Development Cooperation and 19 Belgian
implementing agencies. By signing the new policy, the counterparts committed to ensure quality of medicines in the
programs funded by Belgium’s Official Development Assistance, and to build quality-assurance capacity in the recipient
countries. Implementers are requested to integrate in their financing applications a section for pharmaceutical quality
assurance, with a justified budget. They are also invited to consider how costs could be rationalized and mutualized by
aligning the strengths of the various implementers. This model policy has the potential to be considered for adoption by
other donors, to help to reduce the current multiple standards in pharmaceutical quality, and to contribute to protect
vulnerable communities from the plague of poor-quality medicines.